Repository navigation
docs: add page on adopting a naming convention for existing flows - #489
Conversation
|
Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.
|
|
Claude finished @dangrondahl's task in 1m 56s —— View job Follow-up review complete
Previous finding 1 (archived-flow naming contradicted the tutorials) — resolved. The "Limits" bullet in Previous finding 2 ( 1 new inline comment: the rewrite introduces a specific quoted error string and a " Summary comment: #489 (comment) |
Follow-up review of commits a6b68b8..81b4067Previous finding 1 (archived-flow naming contradiction with tutorials) — resolved. The "Limits" bullet was rewritten to say archiving renames the flow to Previous finding 2 ( New inline comment (1): the rewritten bullet adds a specific quoted error string and a " |
…490) ## Summary The publishing log for #489 reported: ``` Failed to parse page content at path implementation_guide/phase_2/plan_organizational_structure/naming_conventions/existing_flows.md: Expected a closing tag for <name> (61:270-61:276) before the end of paragraph ``` The quoted error message in the Limits section contained a bare `<name>` placeholder inside double quotes, which MDX reads as an unclosed JSX tag. This wraps the quoted error in a code span, matching the `<name>-archived-at-<timestamp>` placeholder earlier in the same sentence, which already uses one. Follow-up to #489.
Summary
implementation_guide/phase_2/plan_organizational_structure/naming_conventions/existing_flows.mdcovering how to move flows already in use onto a naming convention: rename rather than recreate, how the old name behaves after a rename, rollout order, trail-name caveats, and limits.config/navigation.json, after Flows and Trails.The "how the old name behaves" section mirrors the
kosli rename flowlong description from kosli-dev/cli#1322.Closes #487
Validation
mint broken-links: no broken linkspytest tests/: 65 passed