Repository navigation
Implementation Advice: JARM downgrade - #876
Open
davetonge-mh wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
davetonge-mh wants to merge 1 commit into
davetonge-mh wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
📄 HTML preview Drafts changed in this PR: Preview of cb93fa2; updated on every push. For review only — the official specifications are published at https://openid.net/specs/ |
davetonge-mh
force-pushed
the
davetonge/impl-advice/733-jarm-downgrade
branch
from
October 28, 2026 13:58
d94cf24 to
cb93fa2
Compare
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A client that requests JARM from an authorization server that advertises JARM support should reject an authorization response whose parameters, such as
codeandstate, arrive directly instead of in aresponseJWT. JARM's processing rules only cover validating a JWT response, so they do not address this case. Based on the text proposed on the issue, reworded to say what a non-JARM response is. The JARM reference is copied from Message Signing.Closes #733