Skip to content

Add mirror.latigo.net (Tuscaloosa, Alabama, US) - #1418

Merged
jonathanspw merged 1 commit into
AlmaLinux:masterfrom
skimanwhite:add-latigo-mirror
Nov 7, 2026
Merged

jonathanspw merged 1 commit into
AlmaLinux:masterfrom
skimanwhite:add-latigo-mirror

Conversation

@skimanwhite

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@skimanwhite skimanwhite closed this Nov 5, 2026
@skimanwhite skimanwhite reopened this Nov 6, 2026
@skimanwhite

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Adds Latigo LLC's mirror in Tuscaloosa, Alabama (AS19684).

Verified serving repomd.xml for 8/9/10 on both BaseOS and AppStream. Happy to adjust update_frequency, the rsync module, or the geolocation fields if anything does not match your expectations.

@jonathanspw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for the mirror! I've been trying to find us a mirror in Alabama for quite some time :)

@jonathanspw
jonathanspw merged commit 70ec261 into AlmaLinux:master Nov 7, 2026
1 check passed
@jonathanspw

jonathanspw commented Nov 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It would be great if you'd sync every 3 hours - that's our suggested value, but if you can't 6h is perfectly acceptable.

@jonathanspw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The folder path without a trailing / throws a 404 which is causing the mirrorlist to flag the mirror as broken.

jonathan@jon-laptop:~$ curl -I https://mirror.latigo.net/almalinux/
HTTP/2 200 
server: nginx
date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 18:39:57 GMT
content-type: text/html

jonathan@jon-laptop:~$ curl -I https://mirror.latigo.net/almalinux
HTTP/2 404 
server: nginx
date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 18:39:59 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 146

@skimanwhite

skimanwhite commented Nov 8, 2026 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jonathanspw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Looks good now.

Something I did notice, however, is a bit odd routing that you may want to investigate. I'm in the Birmingham area and doing some basic testing from a Windstream/Uniti connection my traffic is bouncing from Birmingham area to Atlanta, which I expect honestly, but then to Nashville, back to Atlanta, before ultimately landing in Tuscaloosa.

traceroute to mirror.latigo.net (162.254.225.154), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  jon-home (172.19.224.1)  0.154 ms  1013.932 ms  1013.928 ms
 2  * OPNsense.localdomain (192.168.50.1)  0.364 ms  0.354 ms
 3  h1.52.55.139.dynamic.ip.windstream.net (139.55.52.1)  7.193 ms  7.184 ms  7.174 ms
 4  ae4-0.agr04.cmrc01-ga.us.uniti.net (40.138.82.192)  7.061 ms * ae4-0.agr03.cmrc01-ga.us.uniti.net (40.136.117.254)  7.041 ms
 5  * * *
 6  * * nash-b2-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.58.252)  17.802 ms
 7  nash-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.137.56)  18.380 ms  18.369 ms  18.505 ms
 8  atl-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.137.54)  16.401 ms nash-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.137.56)  18.203 ms atl-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.137.54)  16.192 ms
 9  atl-b1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.113.9)  16.555 ms  16.481 ms  16.536 ms
10  atl-b1-link.ip.twelve99.net (62.115.113.9)  16.759 ms  16.269 ms  14.712 ms
11  ip-69-67-166-71.rev.ogital.net (69.67.166.71)  16.779 ms 209.170.89.234 (209.170.89.234)  31.791 ms ip-69-67-166-71.rev.ogital.net (69.67.166.71)  17.243 ms
12  ip-69-67-166-71.rev.ogital.net (69.67.166.71)  14.977 ms ip-69-67-166-80.rev.ogital.net (69.67.166.80)  16.952 ms  16.937 ms
13  ip-69-67-166-40.rev.ogital.net (69.67.166.40)  17.374 ms  16.786 ms ip-69-67-166-80.rev.ogital.net (69.67.166.80)  16.621 ms
14  ip-69-67-166-40.rev.ogital.net (69.67.166.40)  15.297 ms  15.543 ms ip-69-67-166-33.rev.ogital.net (69.67.166.33)  22.675 ms
15  ip-162-254-225-16.rev.ogital.net (162.254.225.16)  23.214 ms ip-69-67-166-33.rev.ogital.net (69.67.166.33)  20.985 ms  22.643 ms
16  ip-162-254-225-41.rev.ogital.net (162.254.225.41)  22.675 ms  23.351 ms  23.341 ms
17  ip-162-254-225-41.rev.ogital.net (162.254.225.41)  22.643 ms ip-162-254-225-38.rev.ogital.net (162.254.225.38)  22.876 ms  22.865 ms
18  ip-162-254-225-38.rev.ogital.net (162.254.225.38)  22.853 ms ip-162-254-225-19.rev.ogital.net (162.254.225.19)  22.259 ms ip-162-254-225-38.rev.ogital.net (162.254.225.38)  22.832 ms
19  ip-162-254-225-19.rev.ogital.net (162.254.225.19)  22.239 ms ip-162-254-225-7.rev.ogital.net (162.254.225.7)  21.789 ms  22.047 ms
20  * ip-162-254-225-7.rev.ogital.net (162.254.225.7)  22.062 ms  20.464 ms

@skimanwhite

skimanwhite commented Nov 10, 2026 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants